Introduction
The Coffey /
Walker / Lehman / Bellas /Teele
Families
By
Fred Coffey.
Welcome
to the Coffey / Walker / Lehman / Bellas / Teele Family Tree.
If you've been here before, following are the common entry points:
CONTENTS SURNAMES INDEX HOMECARD MORE
If
you've just popped in to look for info on a specific person, you might try
Surnames or Index. If you just want to browse, you might start with HomeCard. (There's also a collection of miscellaneous
papers I've written on family genealogy topics, click above on
"MORE".)
BUT DON'T MISS
IMPORTANT INFORMATION!!
The
system is based on finding and moving among what are called "Web Family Cards". From any
card, you can move UP the tree by clicking on selected Parents. Or you can move
DOWN the tree by clicking on selected Children.
What
may not be obvious is that you can also click on the name of the person (i.e. the husband or
wife). That opens another page called a "Person Sheet" that may contain more information on that
person. From there, you should ALSO
look for a line or section called "Misc.
Notes", and see if it suggests "Click on this link for more info on this
person; ", followed by a hyperlink address. If that is available,
click again.
This
last "click" will load a biographical report discussing the person of
interest. There are hundreds of pages of these notes in the system!
And
then of course you can use the "back" arrow on your browser to return
to where you started.
Important: Everybody is
indexed with the name they were born with, i.e., maiden name for female
ancestors and cousins. I remember my grandma as Linnie
Walker, and after she remarried as Linnie Northrup, -
- but she was born as Linnie Machlan
and that is how she is indexed. (If I couldn't remember her birth name,
I might have better luck looking for grandpa Everett Walker, the (first) man
she married.)
PRIVACY:
This
is a public tree, and anybody is invited to look. However it excludes details
on living persons, including names, dates and biographical notes. For example,
if you click on "Homecard", you will see
the principal persons are "Living COFFEY" and "Living
LEHMAN". Those people are actually myself and my wife,
and that's all you get to see. But you can move UP the tree to our parents, and
see everything I know about them.
If
you are a trusted family member (say second cousin or closer?) you might ask me
for a CD that contains the full tree, with no details omitted.
THE BIG FAMILY
PICTURE:
The
title calls this the "Coffey/Walker/Lehman/Bellas/Teele" tree. Those are the five major branches of the
family. I've organized it this way to help sharing with my close cousins - and
Walker cousins (my mother was a Walker) wouldn't care about the Coffey branch,
and so on.
If
you're a browser, start with the HomeCard above. From
there you can see parents with Coffey,
Walker and Lehman names. Click there, and
you should be on the branch of interest. And my Coffey first cousins, for
example, can mentally substitute their own parent for my father, and move right
on up the tree! If you're looking for the Bellas branch, click down
on my first child identified as Òliving CoffeyÓ and
you'll discover he first married a "Bellas".
Then you can move on up that branch. And if you look toward the bottom of our
sonÕs card, youÕll see ÒSpouses: 1, 2Ó. Click on the Ò2Ó, and youÕre ready to
start up the Teele
tree.
Now,
the Lehman and Bellas branches are small, and there's
no way to get lost. But the Coffey, Walker and Teele
branches are HUGE, and it's very easy to get lost as you click about. So I
offer three road maps (LARGE FILES, up to 1.8 MB size):
Click
here on the names COFFEY
or WALKER or TEELE and you will
access one of three "PDF" pedigree charts (Multiple pages: Coffey =
41 pages, Walker = 35 pages, Teele – 47 pages).
The pedigrees start with my father Leo COFFEY, with my mother Elsie WALKER, or
with Louis Gardner TEELE. Print or
view one of these, and you'll have a very good layout of the family.
INTERESTING
PEOPLE AND INTERESTING TRIVIA:
Now,
there are lots of interesting people in this tree, and I want to introduce you
to some of those I found most fascinating. But I know that if the reader is a
"Coffey", he's not going to find the "Walker" people so
interesting. So let me offer a way for cousins to spot the ones they want to
learn about:
For
some of the discussion that follows: If you're a "Coffey", you're a
"C"
If
you're a "Walker", you're a "W"
If
you're a "Lehman", you're a "L"
If
you're a "Bellas", you're a "B"
If
youÕre a ÒTeeleÓ, youÕre a ÒTÓ
Combos
are allowed. My sisters and their families are "CW". My daughter is a
"CWL". My grandson is a "CWLB".
NOTE: Most of the
following people are directly hyperlinked to their Biographical Notes. If you
want to explore up or down the tree from there, you'll have to come back to
here and look them up in the Surname Index (see above). The Teeles,
however, can immediately move up and down without coming back here.
A WORD OF CAUTION:
I
don't "guarantee" any of the relationships shown herein. ThereÕs
always work to be done to verify data. See later discussion regarding
methodology and future plans.
The Names:
I
call this the "Coffey – Walker –
Lehman – Bellas - Teele"
tree, because those are the names of the living persons investigated. However
there are of course hundreds of other family names involved in each of their
ancestries.
Here
are some statistics you might find interesting: In the 1930 USA Census there
were 225,870 persons using the "Walker" name, 16,980 using
"Lehman", 14,713 using "Coffey" (not counting 3,707 using
"Coffee"), 759 using "Bellas",
and 424 using ÒTeeleÓ. (That's not counting a number
of people who got their names spelled wrong by the census taker.)
In
the 1990 census, Walker was #25 in the list of most frequently used surnames.
Coffey was #850, Lehman was #1186, Teele was #34,586,
and Bellas was #41,351. Obviously, the Coffey
families are more prolific than the Lehman families, since we overtook them between
1930 and 1990! But we'll NEVER catch the Walkers! And if you're a Teele or Bellas, you're almost
unique!
You
always hear about the Pilgrims – but they were NOT the first settlers in the
new world. The Jamestown Colony in Virginia was founded in 1607, beating the
Pilgrims by 13 years. No, none of our ancestors were on the first boat to
Jamestown – our ancestor waited until the "second supply"
voyage, which arrived in 1608. We find "Gentleman" Thomas GRAVES
(W) arriving on the ship "Mary and Margaret" in 1608. He was an
influential man, and active in the affairs of the Colony. However the title
"Gentleman" probably indicated he considered himself above the
"hard labor" of being an early colonist – and the surplus of
"Gentlemen" versus "Workers" was an extremely serious
problem in early Jamestown!
There
is a CHANCE that an ancestor on the Coffey side arrived at about that same time
as Thomas. We can trace our ancestry back to a Thomas
ROBINSON (C) who was found in the Virginia Colony in about 1690, and there
was a "Gentleman John Robinson" who was an original settler. However
"Robinson" is a too common name, and so far nobody has been able to
prove the connection.
Another
early arrival in Virginia was George TRUITT
(W), who got to the colony in 1640 and who married Frances, the daughter of the
above Thomas GRAVES.
Pilgrims and
Puritans:
The
Pilgrims were late-comers, but did finally arrive in
1620 on the Mayflower. I havenÕt found any ÒMayflowerÓ ancestor, but the
Puritans were right behind them, and settled the area around Boston. And the ÒTeeleÓ
lines trace their ancestry back to dozens of these early immigrants – but
I donÕt know who was first.
The Dutch at
New Amsterdam (now New York City):
The
settlers of New Amsterdam, which became New York, were close on the heels of
the Pilgrims, and we have ancestors arriving on the first ship! The very first
"Coffey side" family ancestors to arrive in America were Joris Jansen RAPALJE (C) and his wife Catalina TRICO
(C), who arrived in 1623. And the very first child to be born in America was
their daughter Sarah Jorisen RAPALJE (C). And on the same ship with Joris and Catalina, were Adrienne and Guillaume
VIGNE (C). (That name is pronounced "vin-yeh",
and means "vine" in French - bet you didn't know that a lot of the
New Amsterdam settlers were actually French Walloons!) There's lots of good
reading for these people.
Hans Hansen
BERGEN (C) arrived from Norway in about 1633 and married the above Sarah.
There are now a huge number of people with the "Bergen" family name,
and they've written books about Hans and his descendents. There are a LOT of
notes about Hans.
Other
early immigrants were Adrian Hendrickse ATEN (C), who arrived from Holland in
1651, and Michael
DEMOTTE (C), who arrived by 1665. The files on each of these have items that
make interesting reading.
Meeting Native
Americans (Indians):
See
in particular the files about the above New Amsterdam people. A careful reading
will show several aspects of the settlers' relations with the Indians - - some
not reflecting very well on the whites involved. Better received was George TRUITT
Jr. at Jamestown – he and his father were Quakers, and the Indians
respected the Quakers because they treated them fairly.
But
itÕs the TEELE ancestors that really tangled with the Indians. In 1675 and 1676
the colonists were engaged in a major conflict with the areaÕs Native American
inhabitants, known as ÒKing PhilipÕs WarÓ. Proportionately, it was one of the
bloodiest and costliest wars in the history of North America - 800 out of
52,000 English colonists (1.5%) and 3,000 out of 20,000 Native Americans (15%)
lost their lives due to the war (per Wikipedia).
On
24 Jun 1675 there was a skirmish at Swansea, and Robert
JONES, (T), along with his son John and his son-in-law Joseph
Lewis, were all killed and scalped by Indians. On 2 Aug 1675 Shadrack HAPGOOD (T), then a resident of
Sudbury, was killed in an ambush along with 7 other colonists. Shadrack was age 33, and had 5 children under age 10. And
on 18 Sep 1675 James TUFTS
(T), and as many as 90 other colonists, were killed at the ÒBattle of Bloody
BrookÓ. The dead were buried in a mass grave. James had one illegitimate son, James Jr., whose mother had previously
died. Orphan James Jr. was raised by his grandfather Peter Tufts (weÕll meet
Peter in just a moment). On 19 Dec 1675, Gershom CUTTER (T) and John HARRINGTON
(T), fought in the battle known as the ÒGreat Swamp
FightÓ against the Narragansett in Rhode Island. Harrington also fought in
other battles, and was twice wounded. Another involved ancestor was Lieut. Nathan
FISKE (T), but no one seems sure what he did to earn ÒLieutenantÓ
rank.
Church Politics:
In 1727, Teele ancestor Jonathan HALL
(T) was not pleased with the hard benches in the Medford, Massachusetts
church, and after negotiations he and 24 other gentlemen were able to arrange
for new, assigned pews. Based on the order by social rank, Jonathan got pew
numbers 14.
Vendors of
Strong Spirits:
There were actually several Teele
ancestors living in the town of Medford, in addition to the above Jonathan
HALL. And several of these were conscientious about OTHER community needs
besides the Medford Church - Samuel
WALKER (T) wanted to fill another such community need. In 1662 he
petitioned the town for license for Òstilling strong watersÓ and to allow Òretailinge of LiquorsÉ by ye quartÓ. Other ancestors, Francis
KENDALL (T), George REED (T), and Thomas PEIRCE (T), signed
the petition for this much needed facility. And there were also several other
uncles and cousins who signed. The petition was approved.
On
the Coffey/Walker side, many of my more recent ancestors would have never
allowed alcohol in their house. But going back in time we find a different
view. We find a few ancestors who, in their estate inventories, attached
significant value to their stills and tubs. And we find that Robert WALKER
Esquire (W) in 1769 ÒÉ hath obtained a License to Keep A Tavron on his Plantation where he livs.Ó He renews his license regularly, and when he died in 1786 court records
show the first to appear before the Court was his wife Mary, who wanted leave
to continue to keep the Tavern operating at her home.
Witchcraft?
Everybody knows that the early settlers of New
England were quite serious about their belief in witchcraft, as evidenced by
the Salem Witch Trials of 1692. And one of the Teele
ancestors, Peter
TUFTS (T), gets a mention. The Salem record reads: Òpeter Tuft of
Charlestown also appeared before us Salem June 2, 1692 and also Complained
against both ye aboves (Elizabeth Fosdick &
Elizabeth Paine) for acts of Witchcraft by them Committed on his negro
WomanÓ. Note, however, Fosdick and
Paine were NOT among those convicted or executed. Also of possible interest if
you visit the Boston area, Peter TuftÕs house still stands in the suburb of
Medford, and some historians consider it to be the oldest all-brick house in
the United States.
There
were earlier witch trials, and even executions, before Salem. Of particular
interest is a trial in 1659. At this time Matthew BRIDGE
(T) gave evidence in support of the poor defendant, Winifred Holman. Also
MatthewÕs wife and parents signed statements that she was innocent. They were respected
members of the community, and she was acquitted.
Reports are that my GGGGGGG Grandmother, "Sarah",
the widow of John
BLAGDON, (C) disappeared mysteriously, and was declared
murdered in 1688 in Virginia. Suspects were taken to court, but the case
outcome is not known.
A Riot?
Another
ancestor, Salathial Coffey (C) also appears to have died a
violent death in 1784. Hints in court records suggest there was a riot, or some
sort of civil disturbance. But none of us have figured out the details.
The Walker
Branch Germans:
A
significant branch of our family on the Walker side is of German origin. While
"Walker" (my Grandpa Everett Walker) and "Machlan"
(Grandma Linnie Machlan)
are probably Scottish names, the Machlan side of that
family married with the Arney and Mann families.
These are German names, as are others found on their branches - such as Herman,
Earlywine, and Fulk.
These
Germans are also sometimes called Palatines, based on the region of Germany
they came from. Or they are sometimes called Pennsylvania Dutch (who are from
Germany, not Holland) based on the region where they first settled in America.
And some may have originally been Swiss, with the families simply passing
through the Palatinate of Germany.
You
can read about the story of one German branch, and learn about all of them, in
my files on the Mann and Herman families. Read the following underlined files
IN ORDER for the continuing story. The original immigrants were the families of Jacob HERMAN
and of the Mann
Family (W). The two families were close, and settled together in
"Pennsylvania Dutch" country in Lancaster Co. Pennsylvania area,
where many of their children were born. The two families then moved together to
a German settlement in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia. There
ancestor Jacob MANN married Elizabeth EARLYWINE (from another German Palatine
family), and they then moved their family to Indiana. There
Jacob's daughter Elizabeth Ellen MANN married George
Washington MACHLAN, finally connecting our German and Scottish branches.
George and Elizabeth then moved to Iowa.
Everybody
recognizes that New England is where the American Revolution got its start,
particularly at the battle of Lexington and Concord: Private Jonathan TEEL
(T) and his older brother Gersham were there at that
battle in 1775. And Ammi CUTTER (T) and a group of the ÒOld Men of MenotomyÓ were on hand to ambush a convoy of British
supplies on their way to that battle.
Josiah BEMIS
(T) was a bit old to fight, but he furnished money to the cause – and his
son Josiah Jr. participated in the Lexington Alarm. And Ephriam FROST III (T) joined in later service.
Any of these should qualify their descendants for membership in the DAR
(Daughters of the American Revolution).
The
Coffey families also have several who fought in the Revolutionary War, or
otherwise served as patriots. See Adrian ATEN
(C), who supported the revolution from his "plantation" in New
Jersey, and who "had three sons who fought". One of those sons was
our ancestor, Private John
ATEN (C). Others who we are sure actually did some fighting include
Capt. John
Hathaway (C), Pvt. Henry KIVET
(C), Pvt. Nathan
COFFEY (C), Jesse BARBRE
(C), and Sgt. Matthew MCGLASSON
(C).
On
the Walker side of the family, you will find that Robert WALKER
Jr. (W), Thomas
GRAFTON (W), and George
EARLYWINE (W), were involved. And of special
interest is Peter
ALEXANDER (W) who gave testimony at his pension hearing in which he
described his personal experiences! But not everybody was on the side of the
revolution - - Samuel TRUITT
(W) and his sons were all Tories and faithful to the King!
Private
Matthew
HILLIS (C) also served with the patriots, but in addition his story makes
interesting reading because he took on George Washington in a land dispute
AFTER the war! (It's unproven, but Matthew and other neighboring ancestors were
probably also giving poor George grief in the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794.)
If
you think you might be interested in joining the Sons of the American
Revolution (SAR) or the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR), you should
have little trouble. We have a cousin Timothy E.
PETERMAN (he describes himself as my "quadruple third cousin, once
removed" - - Fred) who is the Membership Secretary & Registrar of the
Kansas Society SAR, and he would be delighted to help you get started. Read the
text attached to his sheet/link for what he has already done and how he can
help. (He is a "C" cousin; you "W" and ÒTÓ cousins may have
to develop your own proof.)
Slavery?
Certainly not in my family! At least that is what I believed most of my life -
- it was inconceivable to me, growing up in a northern state (Iowa), in a
family that knew nothing of their ancestry any farther away than Illinois.
But
then I got interested in genealogy, and began to look farther back in time, and
began to learn to use records like wills, census, tax lists, and court records.
And a different picture came to light.
To
date I have found 27 ancestral families that owned slaves. Eighteen of these
families were on my father's side (Coffey, and the families they married), and
nine were on my mother's side (Walker, and the families they married).
I was
dismayed to learn how many ancestors were slaveholders. But so then were George
Washington and Thomas Jefferson - - it was simply not seen as a moral issue in
their lifetimes. Also, by the time of the civil war, all of OUR ancestral
families had relocated north of the southern and border states, and were all
solid "Yankees".
I
can provide a list of slaveholder families to anyone who wants it. However I
think it is more interesting here to talk about some of the branches of the
family that were apparently internally conflicted:
One
contrast is on the Coffey side: Various federal census reports, and his estate
inventory, show that the Eli COFFEY (C)
family in Kentucky owned several slaves. However Eli's son Newton Eli
COFFEY (C), left Kentucky for Illinois because of his feelings about
slavery, and worked for the election of Abraham Lincoln.
The
oldest known Walker ancestor, Robert WALKER
(W), owned several slaves. However his son Robert Walker
Jr. (W) became a Quaker, and as far as I can determine never owned a slave.
(I'll talk about the Quakers shortly – while they did not prohibit
slavery, they were commonly found in the ranks of those opposed.)
And
there was also slavery in Massachusetts, and it persisted through most of the
18th century. However there was also a significant free black
population. We suspect involvement
of at least one ancestor - we must be suspicious about the previous statement
(see above) by Peter TUFTS
(T), speaking at the Salem trials of ÒÉWitchcraft by them Committed on his
negro WomanÓ. The choice of words does not imply a free relationship?
Some
of the other connections to slavery will be picked up in the next two sections
below.
Found
one Teele line ancestor, Abner G. TEELE Sr., (T) who fought in the Civil War. I have not yet found records of any Coffey/Walker
ancestors who fought - a quick survey does not reveal any that were of the
proper age at the proper time. However one can find a few distant uncles (siblings
of our ancestors) who fought. Samuel Harrison ATEN (C), a son of
ancestor Aaron Kimble ATEN, fought in the Illinois 3rd Calvary.
Also Jacob
MANN (W) had two sons, Willis and John, who fought in the war. John was
killed on May 18, 1863, fighting with the 18th Regiment of Indiana
Volunteers.
Apprentices and
Indentured Servants:
It
was not uncommon for a relatively wealthy person in America to sponsor another
later arrival, paying his passage in return for a specified number of years of
servitude. While these indentured servants were often treated as badly as
slaves, it is not really a comparable situation – simply because their
term of service was contractually limited.
John HOUGH
(W) and his wife arrived with an entourage of five servants, each indentured to
serve him for 4 years or until age 21. Hans Hansen
BERGEN (C) named earlier, was also noted as having received what
appeared to be indentured servants.
On
the other side of the equation, William
MCGLASSON (C) came to this country in the early 1700's, as an
apprentice to a carpenter. Likewise Hugh SMITHWICK
(C) and Giles
VERMILLION came as an indentured servants. And
look particularly at the story of Edward COFFEY,
who (it is believed) had his Irish lands confiscated by the British and who
then had to come to America as an indentured servant. Edward MAXEY
(W) had his passage paid in about 1690, in return for which his master got 50
acres of land and five to seven years of Edward's hard labor.
I
would note that MCGLASSON (C) and MAXEY (W), after their servitude was
completed, went on to become slave owners.
There
may also be a grey area involving children – orphan children were often
"bound" to other families. Depending on the circumstances this could
be viewed as either a system of foster childcare, or a source of cheap
servants. When our ancestor Mary "Polly" KIVET (C) was four years old
her father Jacob
KIVET (C) died. And then her mother Mary "Polly" BROWER (C)
also died about 3 years later. Polly and her five siblings were left as orphans.
The four youngest children (including Polly) had an uncle appointed as their
"gardian" and authorized to "bind them
out as apprentices". (The two eldest of the orphans, at ages 11 and 13,
were allowed to make their own choice of other guardians.)
The Quakers:
Since
there is a weak connection to the slavery issue, let me next address the
ancestors who were members of the Society of Friends, better known as
"Quakers".
On
the Coffey side, only Peter KIVET
(C) and William
E. Aldridge (C) are identified as heads of Quaker families. And Peter is
the only Quaker I have found that appears to have also owned slaves.
Most
of the Quaker Families (eight of them) were on the Walker side. Some of these
come with interesting stories:
In
1653 George
TRUITT (W) was convicted of fornication, which probably occurred because his Quaker marriage was not recognized by Virginia, and
therefore, according to the government, he was living with an unmarried woman.
George was a very strong Quaker, living in a time when Quakers were a
persecuted minority. His son, George TRUITT
Jr. (W) was also very active. Neither of
them ever owned slaves, and they were good friends of the local Indians, who
felt the Quakers always treated them fairly. However within a few more
generations, their Truitt descendents were counted among the slave owners.
Robert
Walker Esq., and his son Robert Walker Jr., were
mentioned in the previous section on slavery. Robert Jr.
was apparently converted to Quakerism by his wife Mary
Jones (W), the daughter of Richard JONES
Jr. (W). When Robert Jr. was converted, he promptly brought all his
children into the church, including his son, and our next ancestor, William
WALKER (discussed elsewhere). However William and several other children
married outside the church, and were later "disowned" by the Society
of Friends.
Cornelius ATEN (C) was among those moving
west. Born in New Jersey, he moved to Pennsylvania, then Ohio, then Illinois. His son Aaron, born in Pennsylvania, continued the
migration after Cornelius died and ended the trek in Iowa. Lots of our
ancestors were moving in the same direction, to Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa.
The
"Walker" branch also has some among the early settlers to move west
of the Mississippi. See the files for Jacob
Sylvester ARNEY (W). And Bartlett
Yancy WALKER (W). And for some good
first-hand story telling, see the narrative about his Iowa pioneer family
written by J. N.
MACHLAN (W) nearly 100 years ago. (This last one is a long file, and his
narrative starts about 1/3 of the way down.) And if you read the above section
on the German branch of the Walker family, you found another story of our
ancestors moving west.
The Immigrants:
(See
separate discussions on "New Amsterdam" and on "Indentured
Servants" and "The Germans" - - these are stories of immigrant
ancestors.)
Of
course our family ancestors were ultimately ALL immigrants. However for many of
the branches of the Coffey and Walker families, we don't have much information
on exactly when the first ones arrived. More is known about some of the German
immigrants, see earlier discussion. Also see Peter KIVETT
(C), who arrived to contribute to the Coffey group.
In
the years around the turn of the 20th century, there were several
more recent immigrants who became parts of our family. Some of their records
can be found at Ellis Island, and the ship manifests offer some insights into
the people. See John BELLAS
(B) and his wife Julia PAVELKO (B). Also read about the arrival of Anton MALETSKY
(L) and his pregnant wife with 5 children. And Longine RASZEWSKI (B) and his wife Katherine WOLLEN
(B).
So
what are our national origins? Listing the source of the name first, the Coffeys can claim to be Irish, English, French, Dutch,
Norwegian and Scottish. The Walkers can claim Scottish, Belgian, English,
French, German, Irish and Swiss. The Lehmans are
German, Austrian, Hungarian, Polish, Romanian, and Russian. And the Bellas families are Slovakian, Austrian, Hungarian, and
Polish. And all of the above come with a generous helping of
"Unknown".
The "Old
Country" and "Royalty" Connections:
Our
information, for most branches of the family, only goes back to their first
arrival in America - - if even that far. The "Hampton" and
"Lawson" branches of the Coffey family go back farthest in these
records (however be warned that the proof of the connections for these branches
could stand some additional research). Anyway, one John HAMPTON
(C) born in 1517 in Twickenham, Middlesex, England,
is claimed to have been a "Clerk of Council to King Edward VI". And Ralph LAWSON (C), born 1547,
was Knighted by James I of England on July 23, 1603.
Detective
Stories:
There
were a couple of families where the men dropped out of sight, with the women
getting the kids and thus getting remembered by the future generations. The
trick was trying to figure out where the MEN went! I'm particularly proud of
the detective work I did to chase down my great-grandpa J. N.
MACHLAN (W). It was also very tough to sort out whatever happened to
great-great-great-grandpa Marmaduke BARNES (W) - - and this one has a sad ending.
Another
challenge was finding the ancestry of Great-Great-Grandma Dorcas GLASS (C). I worked with cousin Tim Peterman to
solve (most of) this mystery.
There
have been lots of genealogists working on the Coffey family, and I learned a
great deal from reading their work.
But one big mystery that several of the cousins are still chasing
involves presumed ancestor Chesley COFFEY (C). What's the problem? We can't even
agree if the man existed!
However
the Walker family has been another story, and as far as I can tell I am the
only one who has really dug into it. An important missing link was GGG Grandpa William WALKER
(W), and I'm proud of how much I was able to dig up about him.
What's
my biggest puzzle of today? Well, circumstantial evidence, supported by DNA,
suggests that one Marmaduke KIMBROUGH (W) is an ancestor. And I think my
descent is through his son Goldman KIMBROUGH. But I can't prove it! Click on Marmaduke's link and see if you can offer any advice!
Genealogical
Puzzles:
Over
in Illinois, William COFFEY
(C) and his brother Benjamin married the BARBRE sisters, Malcena
and Lucy. And they had children. (Benjamin also married a third Barbre sister, Anna, after Lucy died.)
In
Iowa, Moody
ROBINSON Jr. (C) and his brother John married the ATEN sisters, Ellen
and Martha. And they had children.
The
two Coffey families then moved to Iowa, and met the two Robinson families. And
one child from each Coffey family found a spouse in one of the Robinson
families. And they also had kids.
Now
the puzzle, which you can try out on your friends: "How can two people
have different parents and different grandparents, but have the same identical
set of eight great-grandparents, without any marriages of blood
relatives?"
Stumped?
See the following chart:

Ministers and
Missionaries:
Yes,
there were quite a few. See Newton Eli COFFEY
(C), Velma
Leona COFFEY (C), and Alvina Irene ROBINSON (C). Some ancestors even have
ongoing churches named after them. Read about Benjamin BARNES (W), who founded the Barnes
Methodist Church in Southampton County, Virginia.
A Martyr:
One
Protestant Minister got caught up in the Catholic/Protestant disputes that
arose in England after the Reign of Henry VIII. Ancestor Rowland TAYLOR
(C) was burned at the stake in 1555.
The Old Days:
If
you like reading about the daily lives of people living in old times, see Leo Newton
COFFEY (C), Newton COFFEY
(C), and Elsie
Maureen WALKER (W), Note that these three reports are based on
interviews of living people – something I wish I had the foresight to do
more of many years ago!
A Favorite
Ancestor?
Do
I have a favorite ancestor? Well, if you measure by the hundreds of hours spent
digging for info, and the success in making discoveries, then the winner must
be Robert WALKER Esquire (W), the patriarch of the Walker branch of my family.
Robert
first appeared (no, I don't know where he came from!) in Western North Carolina
in 1768, and died in 1786. He was an innkeeper, a judge, a politician, a land
speculator, etc. And he was a friend of the Moravians, who kept wonderful
diaries. And his home area eventually became known as "Walkertown",
which is now a thriving city near Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
There
is a biographical note attached to the family tree. But a more expansive
analysis can be found in a separate web page. Click on:
www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/FamilyNotes/AboutRobertWalkerEsq.htm
Steel
Executives:
Albert L.
LEHMAN
(L) was a successful president of a steel company.
Russian
Soldiers:
Gotthelf F. LEHMAN (L), before he immigrated to America, served in the Russian
army - - because he thought the food was better than in the German army. He was
living in Poland. But spoke German at home. His wife was Irma MALETSKY (Maletsky is Polish for "Small") - - her German
family chose the name because it sounded more Polish than their original family
name of "Klein" (German for "Small"). This is all
explained!
The
"Famous" and the "Remote":
If
ÒfamousÓ means they put up your statue, let me introduce John
BRIDGE (T). There is a large sculpture of John Bridge located on
Cambridge Common, near the intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and Waterhouse
Street, in Cambridge, MA. Also, if JohnÕs statue would look off toward its
left, he would see ÒHastings HallÓ, which sits on the Harvard Law School
campus. This building honors the family of Deacon Walter
HASTINGS (T). WalterÕs home was originally on this site, and money for the building was contributed by a descendant of his.
Actually, several ancestors had connections with Harvard, or owned property on
what eventually became the expanded Harvard campus. But Walter is the only one
had the distinction of (eventually) having a Harvard building named after his
family.
For
a Coffey shot at "famous", I have to go way back, and reach for the
brother of an ancestor: One claimed ancestor, Margaret TYNDALE (C), born in
1510, had a brother named William
TYNDALE, born about 1495. William became well known for his negative
comments to and about King Henry VIII, Sir Thomas More and Cardinal Thomas
Woolsey. He then prudently fled to Germany from England, and translated the
bible into English. He then got burned as a heretic. By the way, Margaret
married the Protestant martyr Rowland TAYLOR, mentioned earlier.
They're
not ancestors, but among our distant cousins are two U.S. Presidents. Deep
within this tree you'll find President James MADISON and President Zachary
Scott TAYLOR. They're on the "Coffey" side of the tree. You can look
them up in the Index, but if you just want to see how they fit in, visit the
notes on the TAYLOR
Family.
The
next best I can do on "Famous" is our distant Coffey Cousin, the
actor Humphrey
BOGART. His branch also wins as "most remote contemporary
relative" - - he is a half 8th cousin of the children of Newton
and Gertrude Coffey.
Below
is a chart, showing the connection to Humphrey. My daughter Laura was
fascinated by the connection, so the chart is extended to her level:

One
of the most remote in time is one Thomas LAWESSON (C), born in 1250. Another contender is Richard Gervais DE HAMPTON (C), who was born in 1430. One
branch, however, went so far back I didn't have the patience to enter it all -
- have a look at the notes with James CAMPBELL
(W), whose ancestors take us back to 772 BC. You don't believe the last one?
Well I found it all on the Internet, so it must
be true!
(You
like working maze puzzles? Go visit Humphrey Bogart in this tree, then try to find the path to Richard Hampton and/or Thomas Lawesson by clicking on names!)
"COFFEY"
Origins:
Often
the information available about our ancestors does not give us a clear picture.
It can be difficult to establish the facts and connections. One of the
"researchers" of our family is Mr. Timothy E. Peterman (see note with
"The Revolutionary War" above). Look to the file for Chesley COFFEY (C) for a lengthy discussion by Tim
about his efforts to decide if Chesley was REALLY one
of our ancestors. (He's still not sure.)
In
searching the Internet, I find that many sites then extend the Coffey tree back
beyond Chesley, in a way that is not inconsistent
with Tim Peterman's analysis. I have done so, showing Edward Jr.
COFFEY (C) as Chesley's father. See the notes
with EJC for my logic. However the connection remains quite speculative.
If
you do believe this connection, then it is generally accepted that Edward Jr's parents are Edward COFFEY
(C) and his wife Ann Powell. And this opens up a connection to a huge additional
branch of "Coffey/Coffee" cousins, who claim Edward and Ann as their
ancestors. See the notes with Edward for discussion of Edward's origins,
including some interesting history of the COFFEY name and its Irish origins.
There
are more information links available at the "Coffey Cousins
Clearinghouse", which can be found on the Internet at
http://www.thecoffeycousins.org/coffeycousins.html
Can Science
Help? Testing DNA:
The
"Cousins" have started a project to test Y-DNA to establish the possible
family links, and I am one of the participants in that study. I also got myself
appointed "Web Master" of our DNA discussion page. This is a
continually evolving effort, and for the most current discussion and results go
to:
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/DNA/
There
is another DNA project we are pursuing, this time chasing Mitochondrial DNA, or
"mtDNA" - - which is passed down along the
female line. We used it in a failed effort to pin down the ancestors of my
great-great-grandma Dorcas GLASS (C). (If you're looking at paper copies,
look for the joint report with her husband Aaron Kimble Aten.)
A challenge is to find someone on another branch to test - - females change
their names when they marry, and tracking them is hard! See the page for Dorcas to learn what we know so far, and how we got there.
If
you are a close cousin or other relative, you can ask me for more. I can send
you a CD. It will include a personalize pedigree chart, some
"scrapbook" type info, a tree incorporating living relatives, and if
you wish help in turning this all into a paper report. I can offer GEDCOM
files, and files for the Macintosh "Reunion" software that I use.
Most of the biographical reports are kept in Microsoft Word format.
METHODOLOGY /
LIMITATIONS / PLANS:
Now
that you've had a first look, let me (1) give you some idea on how I got this
information, (2) introduce some qualifications regarding the reliability of the
information, and (3) mention where I plan to go from here:
The
initial core of information was collected several years ago from family
sources. I owe particular thanks to Illa (Dorsey)
Coffey, who worked for some years in cooperation with Tim Peterman; To Dorothy
(Coffey) Smith, who wrote some of the essays on the family; To Geraldine
(Walker) Binning, who helped extensively with the Walker family; To Ken Larash for work on the Lehman family; To Sandra (Bellas) Coffey, who is just beginning research on the Bellas family; To my "sixth cousin" Nancy Granros, whom I discovered by chance in Miami at a computer
genealogy seminar when she observed "I have 'Vermillions'
in my family too!" And to each
of those people who helped with autobiographical information on themselves.
From
this starting point, I recently began using the Internet to explore family
connections. It turns out there are thousands and thousands of people who are
researching their families, and who have made the information public. I have
used this source to substantially expand my database. As you read the notes in
this "tree" you will find that I have tried to acknowledge all my
sources.
There
is, of course, a serious risk here. This information comes from people that I
do not know, and I do not always know how diligently they have conducted their
research. Some have documented their work carefully, some perhaps less so. Many
of the sources quote hard-copy books that have been published over the years,
but again I have no personal knowledge of the quality of these quoted books.
I
have tried to use Internet sources that tie firmly to the data I have from
family sources, and that seem to be well documented. And many of the sources I
have confirmed by examining census data and other information. I feel good
about the quality of much of the information, and the exceptions are noted.
By
the way, I have for the most part only included direct ancestors and their
first generation children. There are exceptions for persons of special
interest, and also for recent generations. If I were to start entering
information on every descendant of every ancestor I would soon
find a database of at least 20,000 people!
I
view what I have as a "starting point" for future investigation. In
future years I plan to spend some time trying to come up with more solid
verification of the data herein. Meanwhile, accept this data with caution - -
and read the supporting notes to see where it came from.
I've written
a selection of papers on various family genealogy topics, here are some you
might find interesting. The indenting may help show how the topics are related:
This
is the home page of our DNA Project,
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/DNA/
with
a discussion of DNA and Irish Clan origins
http://www.coffey.ws/familyTree/Familynotes/IrishCoffeyOrigins.htm
with
an extended discussion of how the
DNA helps pin down the common ancestor of Edward and Peter,
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/DNA/Edward_Peter_MRCA.htm
and
a discussion of the possible "Holt" family connections.
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/DNA/HoltConnections.htm
Next
is "An examination of the Coffey Families living in and around Russell
County, Kentucky, in the 1800's":
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/RussellCo/
Next
we start an extended examination of one ancestor, Robert Walker Esquire of
Surry County, NC,
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/FamilyNotes/AboutRobertWalkerEsq.htm
including
his relationships with the Moravian community,
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/FamilyNotes/RobWalkerAndTheMoravians.htm
and how he and the Moravians are connected by their travel
routes.
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/FamilyNotes/MoravianRoads.htm
There is also a "Walker
DNA" project to discuss.
http://www.coffey.ws/familytree/familynotes/WalkerDNA.htm
And a discussion of how
Robert's location relates to other ancestors,
http://www.coffey.ws/familytree/familynotes/A3WalkerCoffeyConnections.htm
which includes an examination of Surry County Court Records,
http://www.coffey.ws/familytree/familynotes/A2SurryDirectory.htm
which turned into a digression into the story of one of the
black residents of Surry County.
http://www.coffey.ws/familytree/familynotes/A4StoryOfJaneScott.htm
Next
we explore the frustration of believing I've found a "Kimbrel/Kimbrough"
ancestor, but being unable to prove it:
www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/FamilyNotes/KimbrelConnection.htm
Then
we begin to examine the American patriarch of my family, Edward Coffey,
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/FamilyNotes/CoffeyChenaultConnections.htm
and
an examination of James Coffey, the illegitimate son of Edward's daughter Annister,
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/FamilyNotes/JamesCoffee.htm
with
extended discussion about James' mother Annister,
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/FamilyNotes/MarvinCoffeyNotesOnAnnister.htm
and even more about Annister.
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/FamilyNotes/JohnChenaultNotesOnAnnister.htm
And we discuss the challenge
of reading one of the names, "Anstes", in
Edward's will.
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/FamilyNotes/AnstesCofeyName.htm
I
talk about searching for DNA clues to my "Arney"
family branch:
http://www.coffey.ws/FamilyTree/FamilyNotes/FrederichErnighFamily.htm
And I
offer a look at the letters written by my great aunt Alvina
Robinson, writing about her missionary assignments in India and Burma:
http://www.coffey.ws/familytree/familyNotes/AlvinaRobinson/